Thursday 24 October 2024

The concrete analysis: on the formation of the EFF Youth Command by MAB Shongwe

 

The concrete analysis: on the formation of the EFF Youth Command
MAB Shongwe

 

Introduction.

On the 10th of October 2024, the President and Commander in Chief of the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), together with the officials addressed a media briefing on the upcoming 3rd National People’s Assembly (3rd NPA) and other domestic and international politics.

In relation to the 3rd NPA, the core objective of the presser was to present the core messages carried by the various discussion documents. The discussion documents seek to facilitate, guide, and coordinate discussions outside and inside the conference, as conferences of the EFF are not only about electing new leadership but reflecting on the party, evaluate its leadership and its work of the last five years, thereafter, give mandate of the next five years to the organisation and the leadership that will emerge.

Speaking on the core message carried by the document on organisational character and redesign, the CIC indicated that the document ponders on whether in the formation of the Youth Command, does the EFFSC ceases to exist, or continues to exist, if it does continue existing, in what format. To quote directly from the document, it ponders “In the formation of the Youth Command, the NPA must decide if the Student Command becomes the chapter of the Youth Command, or it becomes the Youth Command altogether. Meaning, branches that exist in campuses become youth command based in institutions of higher learning and as those in ward. In addition, we must also determine if we also form youth command branches in high schools in the founding of the Youth Command. In essence, all education institutions must have an EFF presence”.

In this article, we are going to argue that first and foremost, the EFFSC must continue existing but expand its mandate to basic education. Secondly, we are going to argue that in the current conjuncture, we do not need the EFFYC but what we must do, if the organisation strongly believes the youth component is neglected (which in itself is a serious point of debate), we can remodel existing structures, particularly at ward level such that they have a component that deals specifically with youth issues. Lastly, we are going to argue that in the event where the EFFYC is eventually formed, it must not happen at the expense of the EFFSC, the EFFSC and EFFYC can and must coexist.


On the existence of the EFFSC

As indicated in the introductory session, our firm view is that the EFFSC in its current form is a solid organisation that has captured the imagination and support of young people and workers in institutions of higher education. Furthermore, it is an organisation that contributes meaningfully to the growth and politics of the EFF, particularly electoral politics.

To demonstrate our case, we are going to deal what we characterise as Criticism of the Past and the practical response to such critique by the EFFSC, which has contributed to the solid organisation it is today. Lastly, we are going to use the recent departure of Floyd Shivambu to demonstrate how the EFFSC remains the first line of defence of the EFF whenever it is under attack from political opponents and the hostile white-owned media.

 

Criticism of the past

In the 3rd National Students’ Assembly (3rd NSA), the CIC strongly critiqued the EFFSC, arguing that it was struggling to have a life of its own, run its affairs, contest and win SRC elections without the heavy reliance on the EFF. He further strongly argued that the decision to form the EFFSC was a mistake, since the EFF was itself still forming (we return to this particular view later in the article).

The EFF, through its national leaders, notably the former deputy president who has lost his senses, criticised the EFFSC inability to convert the support it enjoys in institutions of higher education, particularly support in SRC elections, to the electoral fortunes of the EFF.

In wards where there are institutions of higher education where the EFFSC enjoyed electoral hegemony in SRC elections, the EFF did not enjoy the same support.

Of course, this was a serious contradiction as the EFFSC does not exist for itself but as correctly captured in its Constitution, it is established in terms of the EFF Constitution to rally on young people and workers behind the struggle of economic freedom in our lifetime, under the stewardship of the EFF.

 

Response to the criticism

The EFFSC warmly welcomed the correct observation of the CIC, and the leadership that emerged in the 3rd NSA was charged with the responsibility of ensuring that the contradictions identified by the CIC were sharpened. And in the years that followed, the EFFSC went on to build a very solid organisation that had the capacity to run its programs, and most importantly build a machinery for SRC elections.

The EFFSC went on to win many institutions of higher education in the country which were previously led by the criminal cartel masquerading as a political formation called SASCO.

The leadership of the 4th NSA took this work to a different level, which for the first time managed to host an anniversary rally of the EFFSC in 2023 without heavy reliance on the EFF. The EFFSC won SRC elections in almost all universities in the country, and for the first time, won SRC elections in all universities in the Eastern Cape province, a former stronghold of SASCO and stronghold of the ANC.

In relation to the inability of the EFFSC to translate its votes in institutions of higher education to votes of the EFF in local voting stations and wards, the EFFSC responded by making this question the core business of its 4th NSA. And the 4th NSA made intervention which will transform the EFFSC as an organisation fundamentally and respond to the above contradiction.

The EFFSC amended its Constitution and made it mandatory that for one to be a member of the EFFSC, outside being a registered student in an institution of higher education, that person must be a member of the EFF in a local ward, and they must be registered voters with the IEC.

Outside of this important amendment to the Constitution, the EFFSC 4th NSA leadership led massive voter registration campaigns across the country in all institutions of higher education. This program ensured that many young people who believe and support the EFFSC in universities and TVET colleges, register to vote for the EFF in the May election.

And the result of the work that was done in the 4th NSA in amending the Constitution and the massive voter registration programs that were ran were shown on both the voting day and after. In voting stations that where within and in proximity to institutions of higher education, young people came out in their numbers as seen in the videos that were circulating on social media on the day of voting. And the election results demonstrated that majority of those young people were voting for the EFF, as in voting stations within and in proximity to institutions of higher education, the EFF either registered exponential growth or even won such VDs, and even wards in some cases.

In the past 4 to 5 years, the EFFSC has managed to establish itself as a solid organisation that is support massively by students and workers in institutions of higher education. It has built itself as an organisation that responds to its core mandate of rallying students who support it behind the electoral fortunes of the EFF, and the May election proved that beyond any reasonable doubt.

The only question that the EFFSC must respond to, is the question of the challenges of basic education, of absent and debilitated infrastructure, absence of study materials and facilities, shortage of teachers, violence and drug abuse, and many other challenges. In the absence of the Leaners Command, the EFFSC must be able to fill such a gap through expanding its mandate to basic education, this can be done through establishing higher school cells which will be led by leaners and work closely with the leadership of the EFFSC.

 

On the formation of the Youth Command

I.B Tabata in his letter to Nelson Mandela makes a very profound observation, arguing that in the context of the struggle for a better life for the African working-class, the importance of organisation does not lie on the subjective goodwill of its leaders and the well thoughts of its members. What is important, is that objectively, what contribution the organisation makes in the advancement of the objectives of the struggle.

On the formation, we must take guidance from Tabata and ponder on whether objectively, do the material conditions within the organisation and the political environment domestically dictate the formation of the EFFSC.

Let us take a brief tour to history of the formation of the Congress Youth League in the 1940s, an important generation in our pursuit of economic freedom in our lifetime. The formation of the Congress Youth League was not a product of the subjective aspirations of certain individuals, but was necessitated by the prevailing objective material conditions of that time. The ANC was an ineffectual organisation whose main method of struggle was appealing to the conscience of the oppressor to recognise and accommodate the natives, particularly the educated elite, was proving useless. Africans were landless and confined to unproductive and underdeveloped homelands, they were subjected to forced labour and perpetual violence, poverty, and despair. The ANC was unable to respond to all this, it is these conditions of Africans and the inability of the ANC to respond that resulted in the formation of the Congress Youth League.

The Congress Youth League will go on to inspire and lead a radical trajectory which reshaped, repositioned, and rejuvenated the liberation movement in the country. Most notably, was the Program of Action. The YL will go on to produce future leaders of the African revolution, the likes of Prof Sobukwe, A.P Mda, Anton Lembede, Nelson Mandela, Oliver Tambo, and many others.

In pondering about forming the YC, we must be guided by the prevailing material conditions. And our view is that in the current conjuncture, we do not need the YC. The organisation is coming from a very difficult election which saw the organisation’s electoral performance declining for the first time since its formation.

The post-election context is even more challenging, with leaders and members defecting to the MKP. Similarly, we do not think there is anyone who can demonstrate objectively, that the EFF does not respond to issues of young people and thus needs a YC to fill that gap. In fact, the EFF is an organisation that is led by young people and enjoys the support of many young people across the country. On issues of young people, most notably being unemployment, it is the EFF that has been at the forefront of speaking about the issue and proposing sound interventions. In the election manifesto, the EFF proposes unemployment grants for young people, with educational background as a criterion for how much each unemployed young person will get.

It is true that young people suffer the most for the socioeconomic post-apartheid disaster of the so-called democratic project, but the EFF represents and responds to such challenges to the best of its ability, in parliament and in the legislature, including through programs on the ground.

Lastly, I think it is important to take cue from the intervention of the CIC in the 3rd NSA of the EFFSC. He argues that the EFF is still forming itself, it was a mistake to establish another organisation while the EFF was itself forming. The EFF and its EFFSC while being very solid organisations, they are still forming. With the challenges of the recent electoral decline and the looming 2026 Local Government Elections, the EFF must not form another organisation but must dedicate its effort towards rebuilding and building a machinery for the 2026 LGE.

If the organisation strongly believe that the youth component is neglected, in the immediate a YC is not the answer, but we can remodel our regional and local structures such that they have a component, similar to the GBV and Labour desks, to respond to issues and challenges of young people.

 

 

Coexistence of the EFFSC and EFFYC

Our view that we do not need the EFFYC in the immediate does not mean a YC will not be formed in the future. In an event where the EFFYC is formed, it must not be at the expense of the EFFSC, the two must coexist.

Responding to media questions during the press address, the CIC indicates that they do not want the situation of SASCO and the ANCYL where they fight and contest each other. On the organisational character and redesign, the document makes a profound observation that as the EFF, we must not measure ourselves using existing political formations in the country, but we must measure ourselves in relation to our guiding documents and our work in communities, in parliament and the legislature. The ANCYL and SASCO openly defy, contradict, and denounce the ANC, its leaders, and its resolutions. Regional ANC leaders contradict Provincial leaders, Provincial leaders contradict National leaders. In the EFF you will never find such ill-discipline, there is command and control, there is democracy in discussion but adherence to decisions and resolution, lower structures respect the wisdom and decisions of higher structures. The EFFSC respects the EFF, its leaders, and its resolutions, it will do the same with the YC.

We firmly believe that when the YC is eventually formed, it will coexist with the EFFSC.

 

No comments:

Post a Comment